Dear List,

Now that it's another day and I am refreshed, I decide to tell you about other suggestions in the Gospels of Jesus being a fagot according to the Christian fake gospels!

While the gospels portray Jesus as with out sin, on one hand, they suggest that he was full of sin, on the other hand.

In Leviticus 20:13, it states:
"13. If a man also lie with mankind as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them."

Now, let us look at Leviticus 18:22 which states:

"22. Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."

Finally, consider Deuteronomy 23:17 which states:

"17. There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite [homosexual] of the sons of Israel."

Now that we’ve seen these laws of YAHWEH, when you consider the words attributed to our Messiah in the Gospels: "as my Father hath taught me, I speak those things", and "I do always those things that please him", he would have agreed with these laws that YAHWEH taught him to do in order to please YAHWEH. Right? Well, just keep reading, and we will see.

A lot of people say the sin between two men lying together is not committed until they perform the sexual act. But, I beg to differ. The sin is committed when one man lies down intimately with another man even though they may not have committed any sexual acts. Only a woman is supposed to lay down with a man!

We can see this in Micah 7:5 which states:

"...keep the doors of thy mouth from her that lieth in they bosom."

Judging by this verse, we see that only a woman is allowed to lie in a man’s bosom and not another man!

But, with all the suggestions we've seen in the gospels suggesting that Jesus was a sissy, you'd think that the writers of those filthy documents would have had enough of telling that damnable lie!

Oh, no! Not the demonic writers of the gospels, they will go on and on and on subliminally implanting the homosexual view of Jesus in the gospels and in the process, in your mind.

Take a look at how the satanic scribes keeps trying to subtlely infect our minds with homosexuality, through their Jesus, even in the most innocent looking ways.

In Luke 17:34, it states that:

34. I tell you in the night their shall be two men in one bed; the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left.

Do you realize what this is saying?

Two men in one bed!

Man, this violates the laws of YAHWEH in such and innocent looking way, but it is still a violation of YAHWEH's laws!

Real men, who love YAHWEH, would rather rotate one of them sleeping on the floor one night while the other sleeps in the bed every night than do something like that!

The way it is said gives the suggestion that these two men were in the habit of sleeping with each other every night like a man and his wife, and one night one of them were taken.

Cursed be the writers of the gospels!

Now, check out what else YAHWEH has revealed to me.

It's grounds to say that the gospel of Mark had parts that were in it originally that are missing in it today.

The reason why it is missing is because it went too deep in suggesting the homosexuality of Jesus.

At that time, when the church found what was thought to be "The Secret Gospel Of Mark," they cried bloody murder against it and claimed it was false and full of lies.

Others, who got edited versions, thought that the homosexual part did not exist only because it had been taken out by the time they got their copy. But, they thought it was copies of the originals. Because of this, they said the statements never existed in those documents. But, the truth is that they did exist in them, but the edited versions they were looking at, that they thought were exact copies of the originals did not have them.

So the great controversy concerning the Secret Gospel Of Mark continued unto this very day.

If you do a search on the Internet for "The Secret Gospel Of Mark," you will see a lot of sites with Christians saying all kinds of intellectual things against them in such fanciful ways as only a Christian can do.

But, those who quote the statement did exist in Mark, before it was taken out, after so much ranting and raving, give us the quote of the section that is no longer in Mark today.

Now, if you can see through all the attacks on the statement itself and be concern only on the statement, then you will see why the Christians try to neutralize the statement by putting so many attacks before and after the statement.

But, I believe that the statement is true and was a part of Mark, originally, and has been abbreviated and altered into only a few verses in Mark today. We will take a lot at those verses, but first let us take a look at the statement that was in the original version of Mark before it was taken out after being discovered.

I got this statement from the following site:

http://www.historian.net/secmark.htm

Here is a copy of where the Christian, at that time, start ending his attack on the statement and began quoting what it said:

.........................................................................

19......So I will not hesitate to answer the questions for you,
20 exposing their lies from the actual words of the gospel.
21 At any rate, after the part, "They were going up on the road to Jerusalem" and the following things
22 until, "after three days he will arise," it takes up according to the text:
23 "And they went to Bethany and there was a woman whose brother had died.
24 And coming up to him, she prostrated herself before Jesus and said to him, 'Son of David,
25 have mercy on me.' But the disciples rebuked her. And becoming angry,
26 Jesus went with her to the garden where the tomb was. And

Page 3


01 immediately a great sound was heard from the tomb, and Jesus, going toward it
02 rolled away the stone from the entrance to the tomb. And going in immediately where
03 the young man was, he stretched out a hand and raised him up, holding
04 his hand. Then, the man looked at him and loved him and
05 he began to call him to his side, that he might be with him. And going from
06 the tomb, they went to the house of the young man. For he was rich. And after
07 six days, Jesus instructed him. And when it was late, the young man went
08 to him. He had put a linen around his naked body, and
09 he remained with him through that night. For Jesus taught him
10 the mystery of the kingdom of God. After he got up from there,
11 he turned to the region of the Jordan." And after these things, this follows:
12 "James and John go to him," and that whole section.
13 But the "naked man with naked man" and the other things you wrote about are
14 not found. After, "and he goes to Jericho," it adds only, "And the
15 brother of the young man whom Jesus loved was there, as well as
16 his mother and Salome. And Jesus did not welcome them."
17 But the many other things which you wrote both seem, and are, most false. So,
18 the truth according to the right interpretation. . .

[black color and underlined emphasis underlined added by me"

............................................................................

Now, the suggestion of Jesus spending the night with a naked man under a sheet and not letting in the man's family was to much for the Church leaders at that time.

As a result, this account has been left out of the book of Mark, from that point on, and was claimed to be a forgery from that moment until today.

And, when you do a search on the Internet for this document, you will see far more claims of it being false and an insult that you do people considering if the document as authentic or not.

It's as if all the outrage and emotionalism was deliberately done to overwhelm anyone's mind from even considering the document itself. People end up more influenced by all the fire around the statement than the statement itself.

But, I was able to see through the uproar and why it was so great and see the document for what it is - a segment of Mark that was taken out of the original book of Mark or the updated book the writer of Mark was writing before he died.

One of the reasons why I believe the statement is true and not a fraud is because it is consistent with all the other gospel suggestions of the Christian messiah having been a homosexual that I have been showing you!

It fits right in with them! Perfectly!

...................................................................

Speaking of Mark.

In Mark 10:17-27, it talks about how a rich young ruler ran to Jesus and kneeled before him and asked what he could do to inherit eternal life.

And, in verse 21, it says:

21. Then Jesus beholding him loved him...

Now, what is it really saying when it said that when Jesus seeing him, loved him?

One thing for sure, is that it did not mean that when he saw his face he loved him because he had be conversing with the young man for a while and had seen his face from the beginning of the conversation.

So, his face had nothing to do with the love Jesus was turned on by as time went on.

When the verse says, then Jesus seeing him, what did Jesus see, of the man, that he did not see at first?

This suggests that something happened between Jesus and the young man that has not happened when they were conversing.

What was it?

What could have transpired between the two?

And, when the verses said that after Jesus saw what he saw of the man, whatever it was, that he did not see when they were talking, then Jesus loved him.

Why is it that Jesus did not love him at first?

Why did it take for something to happen as time went on for Jesus to then love him?

If he did not love him at first, then this is not the kind of love you have for a good person you meet.

If that is the case, what kind of love was it that was different from the general love that Jesus should have had for him from the beginning?

Do you realized what this suggests!!!

In light of how the most holy and wonderful YAHWEH has used me to take you on a journey, in the fake gospels, to point out how wicked scribes where suggesting, to their readers, with out most of them realizing it, that Jesus was a homosexual, what does this different love that Jesus had for this young man suggest happened between him and Jesus?

IN CLOSING, HOW DO YOU THINK A HOMOSEXUAL WOULD VIEW ALL THE HOMOSEXUAL SUGGESTIONS IN THE SCRIPTURES YOU HAVE SEEN THROUGH ME?

WOULD HE INTERPRET THEM AS MOST PEOPLE WOULD?

OH, NO.

HE WOULD NOT.

HE WOULD SEE A SPECIAL MESSAGE IN BETWEEN THE LINES OF THOSE SCRIPTURES THAT HE WOULD FEEL WERE ESPECIALLY FOR HIM.

HE WOULD FEEL A SPECIAL CONNECTION BETWEEN HIM AND THE BIBLE THAT WOULD ALLOW HIM TO STILL BE A NASTY FAGOT WHILE THINKING THAT THE CREATOR LOVE HIM IN SPITE OF WHAT THE LAWS OF YAHWEH SAYS.

YES, HE WOULD SAY GOD LOVES ME AND BE UP IN THE CHURCHS JUST LIKE HOMOSEXUALS ARE TODAY.

WHY DO YOU THINK THERE ARE SO MANY HOMOSEXUAL CHURCHES APPEARING EVERY WHERE?

IT'S BECAUSE THEY SEE WHAT I HAVE REVEALED TO YOU, BUT THEY INTERPRET JESUS' SUGGESTED HOMOSEXUALITY IN A WAY THAT APPROVES OF THEIR HOMOSEXUALITY AND RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CHURCH AND EVEN HAVE GAY CHURCHES WITH GAY PASTORS WHERE ALL THE MEMBERS ARE FAGOTS!

............................................................................

Yours In The Defense Of The Truth About The Messiah,

Prophet Yahweh
Seer of Yahweh

........................................
the end